Follow the leader

A couple of comments about the race to become the leader of the Labour group in the Scottish Parliament before the race really gets underway.

First, the race is, as I've quite rightly put it in the first sentence, for the leadership of the Labour group in the Scottish Parliament. It is not for leader of Scottish Labour (if indeed there is such a thing). So why - as a practical question more than anything - are there more people voting in this contest than the 46 Labour MSPs at Holyrood?

I mean, I'd understand it if it was for the leadership of the Labour party in Scotland. There would be a lot of people - members, trade unions, elected representatives (all MSPs, MPs and MEPs) in Scotland - that would have a stake who became the leader. But to allow each of the aforementioned groups a one third stake in the contest to lead the MSP group in the Scottish Parliament seems a bit strange. Like offering the whole world the opportunity to vote for West End Community Council. Maybe that's overstating the point - but you get what I mean.

I know independence is a swear word in the Labour party at the moment, but that's exactly what they need - independence from London. As a colleague pointed out to me last night (during a meeting of some of the greatest minds ever to graduate from a fine Scottish unniversity) it was Labour that delivered devolution. Fine. I'm glad they did. But, for a party that was so keen (at the time) to devolve power to Scotland, might they not think about devolving some of their own power base from London to the Scottish party?

Labour remain the least devolved of the parties in Scotland. Even the arch-unionist Tories (who dusted off the old "Conservative and Unionist" posters for the Glasgow East by-election) have more control over what they do in Scotland. Granted that may be because they lost all their MPs in 1997 and there's little in the way of dissent from David Mundell regarding Annabel Goldie's leadership. But it might also be because the party realised that they were on a hiding to nothing following London's lead after their 1997 wipeout and that rebuilding in Scotland with a Scottish-based party was the only way they could appeal the electorate in Scotland.

Aren't Labour in danger of the same thing? Now I'm not taking sides in the contest - mainly because I can't form an unbiased view - but surely NOT demanding more control over the party in Scotland will just lead Labour into the same mess the "Bring it on" saga landed them in with Wendy & Gordon. Maybe their MPs need to get past their "I won't take orders from the leader of a group in a diddy parliament" mantra and let the party leader in Scotland (sorry, the leader of the Labour group in the Scottish Parliament) have more control over Labour policy in Scotland. If they don't - they may not be MPs for much longer.

Just a thought. Not that I want Labour to get better - I just think that politics in Scotland suffers when the opposition is so weak.

Read more...

Best of the Blogs...

I recently sent my list of favourite blogs to Iain Dale for his compilation of the 100 best for his Blog Digest. Have been asked by several people how I voted and, after some deliberation, decided to post this:

#1 SNP Tactical Voting

The sheer volume of posts (and the quality) make Jeff's SNP Tactical Voting blog essential dailly reading. Some thoughtful posts on wider society, Scotland and local politics make it an interesting mix.

#2 Scottish Tory Boy

A friend from uni, STB will be mad I didn't give him the number one spot. Some great gossip from parly (how does he get such good sources?!) and some (not so good) predictions. Well worth a look.

#3 Kezia Dugdale's Soap Box

Went a bit... bitter & partisan during the by-election but nontheless the pre-eminent Scottish Labour blogger. Useful to get a read on Labour's big ideas - she'll surely be one of those 'thinking big thoughts' in years to come.

#4 Adam Smith was a Socialist

Number-cruncher extraordinaire, ASwaS's terrific posts on the boundary changes merit inclusion in the Top 100 alone. Some other excellent stuff from the by-election, especially on the day.

#5 J Arthur MacNumpty

The weekly report on Parliament. Despite working there, I still get my round-up from MacNumpty - and that's a compliment to the man.

#6 Stephen's Linlithgow Journal

Has become the premier Lib-Dem blogger - something which I'm not sure he's that comfortable with. Blog remains insightful and, as STB says, "not too Lib-Demmy" for a Lib Dem.

#7 Two Doctors

A Green perspective on Scottish politics, the pieces tend to be short, fun and to the point. Nice for a brief read. Incidentally - does anyone know why it's called "Two Doctors"?

#8 Blether with Brian

Brian Taylor's blog should've been titled "Brian's Braces" such is the fame his galluses hold. Blog is always insightful, analytical and, despite seeing him report on Scottish politics for many years, neutral. Anyone know who he votes for?

#9 Ideas of Civilisation

Long and more detailed mosts - which you would expect from a blog with a Voltaire quote as it's title. Good stuff. Its at number 9 as I usually only read it once a week - like the Sunday papers...

#10 North to Leith

Since Davie Hutch handed over the blog to the mysterious Anseo, posts have become less frequent. However, still covers a variety of political issues across the continent.

So there we go. Let the scratching out of my eyes commence.

Read more...

Sunday Papers

Sunday papers make interesting reading.

From the Scotland on Sunday reporting that Labour are considering a "suicide election" soon to save them from an even bigger defeat in 2010 to the Sunday Herald claiming that former Labour leader Neil Kinnock is being asked to privately tell Gordon Brown that it may be time to resign, they don't make good reading for the embattled PM or his party. The Sunday Herald goes further by openly stating that Brown should go and that an election should be held quickly after Labour appoint a new leader, while Iain McWhirter claims Labour need a Brutus to stick the knife into Brown's back

So - is it time?

Glasgow East showed the level of anti-Labour feeling in their own heartlands. I'm not naive enough to think that all of the SNP's vote was a pro-SNP vote and there wasn't a bit of wanting to give the PM a clear message: that he is unpopular, his policies are not working and that maybe he should consider his position.

I think there may be something in the suicide election idea. Labour know they will get absolutely thumped if they go into an election with Gordon Brown as leader - possibly even worse than the Conservatives wipeout in 1997. So why not install a leader to take the fall - Jack Straw maybe - then regroup in opposition with the potential for a fresh candidate (Miliband) to take over (a la Tony Blair)? That's the Scotland on Sunday suggestion.

It does appear though, that whatever Labour does, they are looking at a long period of opposition to a Conservative party with David Cameron as leader.

Something to think about certainly.

Read more...

Glasgow East: The Aftermath (Part 2)

With apologies in advance to Stephen Glenn, this post will focus on everyone’s favourite political irrelevance – the Liberal Democrats.

Now I know Kenny Gibson got slated for his motion entitled “The Irrelevance of the Liberal Democrats” which, quite rightly, was included in the watchdog Crap Holyrood Chat. But I can’t help but think he might have a point – even if that is maybe isn’t quite the right forum to air that particular view.

Glasgow East’s result only served to emphasise that point of view. They had someone who, by all accounts was a fairly able candidate and will – presumably – get a chance in future elections. But to amass only 915 votes and lose their deposit in a constituency where they’d consistently performed reasonably well in the past is simply not good enough.

Now you can (and Stephen Glenn probably will ) make the point that this election was, from the off, a two horse race, and the Lib Dem vote was squeezed further by the resurgent Conservatives (who were smart with their candidate selection and ran an efficient campaign). But even so, their performance – lost deposit and all – is simply not acceptable for a party that claimed to be “The Real Alternative” government.

So I suppose the question is this: what are the Liberal Democrats (good for)? I guess that’s 2 questions really. It’s not enough to be a political party with (fairly substantial) representation – both at Westminster and Holyrood – without having something to define yourself by.

For all the Lib Dem bluster about standing up for civil liberties where were they when Alex Salmond wanted to allow the Scottish people their democratic opportunity to decide on Scotland’s future? Nick Clegg has hardly established himself as a political heavyweight since he took on the leadership. Indeed if you showed 100 people in Scotland a photograph of him how many of them (excluding members of his party) be able to tell you who he was?

I guess I’m trying to be constructive here. For the Lib Dems to be good for anything they’ve got to re-define themselves ala New Labour or Cameron’s “green” Conservatives (complete with new tree logo). But without the charismatic leader, that seems a difficult process. But they better do it quickly, or they will become an irrelevance, both in Scotland and the UK.

Unfortunately for them, it seems the future’s bleak. The future’s orange.

Over to you Stephen...

Read more...